So, this whole thing makes me wonder if the issue - rather than cultural appropriation - is actually based on cultural abandonment.
The assumption that only privileged whites have the money and/or time to paddle canoes is flawed. If it was a fact that people of color have no hobbies or cultural interests that they pursue, then it might have merit. But I see plenty of ethnic groups golfing, fishing, playing various ball sports, riding motorcycles, gambling at casinos....you name it.
If there are few or no First Nations people (or other people of color, FTM) canoeing, why are they not attracted to the activity? We know it isn't expensive, unless you choose it to be. It doesn't require any more time than these other leisure activities (we should include the most popular - watching TV). There aren't social barriers that I am aware of (those nasty bigoted paddling groups?)
Is there some self-imposed stigma that repels non-whites from canoeing? If it were simply a matter of being offended because canoes were employed in First Nations' subjugation, why would other groups not participate? And if the canoe was a First Nations traditional tool, why wouldn't they want to reclaim their dominance in it's design and skill?
Seems if it wasn't for "privileged whites", canoeing would be all but dead and forgotten. Even if it is "cultural appropriation", is that necessarily a bad thing?
BTW, I have FN blood in my veins, as well as European, so none of this applies to me.