Bears are tasty. Not urban garbage eating bears, but bears that grow up eating blueberries, grubs and grass.
Nice post by Perry.
Alan,
May I suggest you avoid the use of the word "naïve" in discussions like this one with people that know what they are talking about.
Sorry PPine
Totally disagree with your stance on not using an attractant and your way off base as far as his condition. He's a full grown older male in his prime and if he was addicted to human food he would have tags in his ears and I would have seen his tracks/scat/damage around my home. Our bears do leave there dens on occasion and no doubt feast on winter die offs/kills. This wasn't his first meal since last December by any means.
I'm not in Lake Tahoe it's a lot different here in rural northwest Connecticut. A one time placing of an attractant in front of a trail camera will not alter this bear's habits and to suggest so is naive.
We've had to trap and relocate several bears now in the last few years and two of them traveled an impressive distance to return. My town is going to have to take a serious look at bear resistant garbage storage and bear-proofing our properties.
Oh now you've gone and brought the Lynx thing up.
Have a look at this from a few weeks ago. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/thund...-flies-inside-northern-ontario-home-1.3009166
I always say things as I see them and for the most part I don't agree with his type of research. I'm all for scientific research if its for the protection and good of an animal and if it's done in an inconspicuous way . Once a researcher starts interacting with and interfering with the normal behavior of the animals is where they lose my respect and support. His bears are going to react a lot different then a bear in the "real" wild.
Rogers gives wildlife biologists a black eye.