Try looking up Glow Table on
www.instructables.com to light up your checker board for night games.
I like that, and may try adding some Glow Powder to the first coat of pigmented resin on the future carroms board tabletops. I know where there are a half dozen defunct camp chairs with beverage sized arm pockets and have a variety of hole saws for the drill press. Mark 6 tops this fall after I scavenge some beverage-sized mesh pockets.
Night Carroms would be easier and safer than Night Horseshoes (glow sticks attached to the shoes and poles).
We play a lot of games on family trips. Physical games like all-terrain bocce, and mental games like Botticelli. The latter is my favorite game amongst a crowd with varied backgrounds, ages and interests, each with their own area of trivia knowledge.
Botticelli is essentially a combination 20 Questions and Trivial Pursuit, but there are no cards or game pieces, and no limit to the number of question tries. The Chooser (winner of the last game as we play) thinks of a well-known person’s last name and gives the first letter of that name.
In order to ask a
Direct Question (“Is this person alive today?” Was this person male?” “Is this person fictional?”
the peanut gallery must first stump the Chooser with an
Indirect Question about a character whose (last or sole) name begins with the same letter as the mystery person.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botticelli_(game)
Framing the
Indirect Questions with enough detail to eliminate alternative “correct” answers and stump the Chooser keeps the askers cleverly involved in crafting the question’s details and adjectives. “Last name starts with P, eh? OK, is this the once destitute English coal merchant whose name became synonymous with freeboard load lines?”
TMI in that Indirect Question, it was made too easy. A more obscure “synonymous with something on ships?” would be better. BTW, as we play BS responses are allowed, provided you don’t get called on it; “No it is not Eustace Porthole, inventor of cabin windows on ships”
Indirect questions can be posed about lesser-known characters, and about those who do not fit the now-established profile of “Living, American, male, author”, etc.
That game is a lot easier to play than it sounds, and speeds along when you discover the name-chooser’s area of weakness. Mine would be Pop Stars of the last 20 years. I don’t know my pop stars from my Kardashians from my Rappers. Even kid players have their youthful advantage; I sure as heck don’t know my Pokémon or Yugioh characters, and young kids can beat the wizened Chooser out of a dozen direct questions on instantaneous Oh-heck-I-give-ups.
There is a lot of laughter in that game, and a lot of banter. “Dammit, Tweedledum starts with a T, not a D”
BTW, as the famous name chooser and answerer of indirect questions “Cassius Clay” is guaranteed to stump them for a long while.
And I still insist my “P” person was famous enough to qualify as a mystery guest; I think the question askers had established “Dead more than 20 years, less than 50 years, American, author and illustrator" and 50 other less significant facts or misleading tidbits. They somehow never got around to “naturalist” or “conservationist”. Or elicit “Cremated and ashes spread, buried and inurned in three different places”.
Who dat? It pays to know something about the name chooser’s background and interests.