- Joined
- Aug 10, 2018
- Messages
- 1,596
- Reaction score
- 2,355
A recent discussion started me wondering if I've missed something critical when choosing wood for a strip build. I know that, traditionally, cedar is used but other woods can and have been used as well. I've always assumed that the trade-off (there always IS one) is weight vs price vs availability and that the ideal wood is one that is readily (ie: inexpensively and easily) available, tools well and has a color or character that we find appealing.
The reason I ask is that, in my quest for interesting, light weight wood that is native to SW PA, I've come to realize that sumac (yes, that little junk tree) is not only gorgeous but very lightweight and easy to work with. I am in the process of gathering 100 board feet or so but no commercial mill will even consider messing with it. I am, therefore, slicing those 6 & 8 inch diameter trees myself into 1x1s and sometimes 1x2s (maybe even an occasional 1x3!) which will then be dried and stripped.
As this process is a HUGE pain the the posterior, I want to be absolutely certain that the canoe I build with the resulting wood is one that I will like paddling so I am planning on building 3 or 4 "testers" (of various patterns) to see how they perform and to get mistakes out of the way on these "throw away" boats (which, of course will not be thrown away). I am currently planning a poplar build with butternut trim, a larch/hemlock(?) combo and a catalpa trimmed in (probably) sassafras.
The prospect of building something beautiful, functional and unique appeals to me as does the diversity of combining the various woods for contrasting color combos and, with 140 species (including white cedar) being native to PA, the possibilities seem endless.
I truly don't mind being a heretic (if that's all it is) but it seems that many are absolutely adamant about CEDAR. Did I miss something?
The reason I ask is that, in my quest for interesting, light weight wood that is native to SW PA, I've come to realize that sumac (yes, that little junk tree) is not only gorgeous but very lightweight and easy to work with. I am in the process of gathering 100 board feet or so but no commercial mill will even consider messing with it. I am, therefore, slicing those 6 & 8 inch diameter trees myself into 1x1s and sometimes 1x2s (maybe even an occasional 1x3!) which will then be dried and stripped.
As this process is a HUGE pain the the posterior, I want to be absolutely certain that the canoe I build with the resulting wood is one that I will like paddling so I am planning on building 3 or 4 "testers" (of various patterns) to see how they perform and to get mistakes out of the way on these "throw away" boats (which, of course will not be thrown away). I am currently planning a poplar build with butternut trim, a larch/hemlock(?) combo and a catalpa trimmed in (probably) sassafras.
The prospect of building something beautiful, functional and unique appeals to me as does the diversity of combining the various woods for contrasting color combos and, with 140 species (including white cedar) being native to PA, the possibilities seem endless.
I truly don't mind being a heretic (if that's all it is) but it seems that many are absolutely adamant about CEDAR. Did I miss something?