Mike, I looked at the reservations (still digesting breakfast here), and the limitations are:
"REQUIREMENTS: Boats: Minimums: length 12’ (20’ maximum), width 48”, depth 18” Canoes: Minimums: length 12’ (20’ maximum), width 35” Kayaks: Minimum length 12’ (20’ maximum) Shells: Minimum length 12’ (20’ maximum) Inflatable or collapsible craft, sailboats, pontoon boats, and propane or gasoline-powered motors are prohibited."
Many thanks, that was on my to-do list for today. IIRC it was 20 years ago limited to “boats”, typically fishermen with jonboats and electric outboards, and canoes, with that same 35” beam requirement but once with a minimum length of 16’ length.
My 12’ Pack canoe didn’t even mis-measure up, and the canoes I did register were, uh, close if not quite. And still too pokey for exploring 50 miles of shoreline paddled solo.
I believe that kayaks and shell were once prohibited, so the regulations have gotten more liberal, except for that stupid 35” canoe width nonsense. Much of that may have been to prevent swimming, or even much body contact with the water. “Oops I capsized and had to swim ashore”. Or rolling.
Swimming in the reservoir prohibited or not, every High Schooler in the Hereford Zone knows the best skinny dipping places on the shoreline. Same body contact for the sailing prohibition, which would be ideal to cover some distance with a canoe or kayak.
That rowing shells are now permitted leads me to believe that a 14’ long x 23/24” wide surf ski would pass muster.
The other legalistic catch is that a permit holder is required to sign a statement attesting that the boat will be used
NO WHERE other than the reservoir(s), for invasive species control. Of course the unregulated river that runs between the two major water supply reservoirs already has invasive Rock Snot and New Zealand Mud Snails, most likely from wading trout anglers, so good luck with that.
And I don’t believe for a minute that every fisherman in a well equipped, trailered boat with electric motor(s) and fish finders and comfy swiveling seats is restricting their use to the reservoir. Same probably goes for some guys paddling canoes that didn’t quite meet minimum specs.
So it looks like you have the choice between a canoe with 35" minimum beam (egad), or an up to 20' kayak (AKA surfski?). Thinking about where you plan to paddle, a fast boat that might handle wind would be the ticket, so for big water/wind maybe a SOT/surfski would make sense (at least a lot more sense than a 35" beam open canoe!). Or maybe some type of partially-decked canoe like a SeaWind/Monarch/Loon/Falcon
I wish I had a lake that close!
It seems a dang shame that I have lived 10 minutes from that reservoir for 30 years and only paddled half of it. Admittedly I’ve already been everywhere I’m gonna paddle to casually solo in a canoe, more than once, and without new destinations to explore reservoir paddling kinda bores me. The No Camping, No Swimming, No Wading, No even freaking getting out of the boat on the shoreline except at the launch takes some shine off. Good thing they don’t regulate the other use for my bailer.
But even the electric motor guys rarely go more than a couple miles from the launch, and there are some far-off deep arms and coves I want to explore. The main stem tributary, which is within easy reach, can be paddled up a considerable distance, more if one calculates “This is moving water, not the reservoir” and wades up past a few river shallows. That trib leads to Hemlock Gorge, an area most often seen from trailside that is even better from a water view.
https://www.hikingproject.com/trail/...ck-gorge-trail
We have a Monarch, and other decked/ruddered canoes, but ideally I would have something faster, or easier to keep at cruising speed with less effort. And shorter/lighter/easier to snatch and grab from the roof racks than the Monarch; I don’t need 17 feet and 50+ lbs of expedition canoe as a day tripping lake and bay hull.
I need to experience how fast a surf ski actually is, or feels in less wetted surface glide and cruising speed effort. The rough calculation length-to-waterline ratio of a Monarch is 7.4. The Epic is less, 7.27, and the Stellar is 6.99. But I’m not paddling theoretical full bore all the time, or even often, and it must be easier to accelerate to and maintain a decent cruising speed in a surf ski. The “accelerate to” is important, I stop to smell the roses (Blue Indigo, Atamasco Lily, Swamp Pink) a lot, or just muckle up solo tucked in near shore for a look and listen. [TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, cellspacing: 0, width: 100"]
[TR]
[TD] [TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, width: 100"]
[TR]
[TD] [TABLE="border: 0, cellpadding: 0, cellspacing: 0, width: 100"]
[TR]
[TD] [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
I am now surf ski curious. Alan, or others with “fast” canoe vs surf ski, please do tell.