G
Guest
Guest
Most of my gel coated boats have spider cracks, but I recently had a curiosity return to the shop after a long absence, a 1991 kevlar Mad River Explorer. Its last 10+ years have seen hard and frequent use, mostly as a rocky river poling boat, enough to have worn through/scraped off much of the E-glass tape I epoxied along the scraped shallow vee years ago.
This ‘91 Explorer has plenty of rock scratches, but the gel coat has few if any spider cracks. OK, I just inspected it, no spider cracks. Zero. What the hell?
I have a similar vintage fiberglass Independence, and other gel coated boats from the 80’s and 90’s, and nearly all of them have spider crack damage, especially along the chines and stems. I know this canoe has not been babied. How is it possible that the gel coat on this boat remains so completely intact and spider crack free?
Seemingly plausible answers (whadda I know):
The stiffer hulls I own definitely have more spider cracks in the gel coat. The sides on this Explorer are flexibly thin, and the bottom a little flexible if I push hard on it (it doesn’t oil can though). The chines seem quite stiff. Maybe some hull flex is actually impact beneficial, especially with thinner gel coat?
The obviously much thicker gel coat on some boats, even very stiff, stoutly built boats, definitely developed more spider cracks. Maybe thin gel coat is better than thick? And weighs less, this ’91 Explorer was speced at 54lbs factory. I presume it is harder to get thinner gel coat done right when building a boat?
This Explorer has rarely been used as a gear-laden tripping canoe. Perhaps that lightly loaded guise helps reduce impact or stress damage?
Or is this was just one of those happy hulls on which everything somehow came together perfectly? How does that happen; just the ideal mix of layup schedule, materials, construction timing and attentive craftsmanship?
I have always though the old Vermont Mad River canoes were exceptionally well made, but for a 26 year old canoe that I picked up as a rotted gunwale derelict 15 years ago this kevlar Explorer is in absurdly good condition. Even with me driving it home an hour on the highway, flopping around near gunwale-less on the racks.
What the hell?
This ‘91 Explorer has plenty of rock scratches, but the gel coat has few if any spider cracks. OK, I just inspected it, no spider cracks. Zero. What the hell?
I have a similar vintage fiberglass Independence, and other gel coated boats from the 80’s and 90’s, and nearly all of them have spider crack damage, especially along the chines and stems. I know this canoe has not been babied. How is it possible that the gel coat on this boat remains so completely intact and spider crack free?
Seemingly plausible answers (whadda I know):
The stiffer hulls I own definitely have more spider cracks in the gel coat. The sides on this Explorer are flexibly thin, and the bottom a little flexible if I push hard on it (it doesn’t oil can though). The chines seem quite stiff. Maybe some hull flex is actually impact beneficial, especially with thinner gel coat?
The obviously much thicker gel coat on some boats, even very stiff, stoutly built boats, definitely developed more spider cracks. Maybe thin gel coat is better than thick? And weighs less, this ’91 Explorer was speced at 54lbs factory. I presume it is harder to get thinner gel coat done right when building a boat?
This Explorer has rarely been used as a gear-laden tripping canoe. Perhaps that lightly loaded guise helps reduce impact or stress damage?
Or is this was just one of those happy hulls on which everything somehow came together perfectly? How does that happen; just the ideal mix of layup schedule, materials, construction timing and attentive craftsmanship?
I have always though the old Vermont Mad River canoes were exceptionally well made, but for a 26 year old canoe that I picked up as a rotted gunwale derelict 15 years ago this kevlar Explorer is in absurdly good condition. Even with me driving it home an hour on the highway, flopping around near gunwale-less on the racks.
What the hell?