G
Guest
Guest
Pettit EZ-Poxy, $40 - $42 a quart, is a “one part polyurethane, with silicon and advanced ultraviolet filters”. Rustoleum Topside, $15-$16 a quart, is an “oil-based modified alkyd with UV protection”. I don’t know enough about marine paint chemistry to address that.
I have painted a couple of boats or boat bottoms with EZ-Poxy and have been impressed with it. But I wanted to try the Rustoleum Topside for comparison, and had two white bottomed decked canoes in need of repainting.
Those bottoms were originally painted with regular Rustoleum Enamel ($9 - $10 a quart). Those two boats see very few rocks, but are often in gentle contact with sandy bay bottoms and beaches. I don’t remember if I used multiple coats of Rustoleum Enamel, but the paint on the stems had very quickly worn through and worse, the paint had just as quickly become chalky dull from UV exposure in semi-shady outside storage.
For the time and effort spent sanding, washing and taping, rolling and tipping out, and more sanding between multiple paint coats, it is penny foolish to use cheap paint, and the extra $6 a quart for the Rustoleum topside seems easily justified. The question remains, is it worth spending an extra $25 a quart for EZ-Poxy?
Initial impressions after rolling and tipping the first coat of Rustoleum Topside. Both paints roll and tip and level equally well. The first coat of EZ-Poxy hides small scratches and color imperfections on the hull better, and additional coats of EZ-Poxy hide most everything.
The Rustoleum definitely has more VOC odor; I had a shop exhaust fan going but even so was a little stoned after rolling and tipping two hull bottoms, which only took 35 minutes. Hours of prep work, minutes of rolling and tipping. Dude, don’t bogart that Rustoleum.
Sanding the first coat, using 220 on a RO sander with an infer-face pad, the EZ-Poxy was, at least in memory, noticeably tougher; I cut through the first coat of Rustoleum Topside in a few places when I got incautious. I would prefer to wet sand paint coats outside near the hose, but it is nearly 100F and humid as heck out, and I have the shop AC unit running. Plus those are two heavy, woven roving/glass/thick gel coat hulls, and I don’t feel like hauling them in and out of the shop multiple times.
BTW, I don’t know what I don’t know. Or what I didn’t know. I didn’t know there was such a thing as foam interface pads for RO sanders ‘til Alan Gage suggested them. There are not that many flat areas on a hull bottom, and RO sanding along the chine curves with a hard RO surface was always a risky, oops cut-through again business.
The interface pad makes a huge difference; what would have taken me an hour to hand sand, wet or dry, took but a few minutes. And then a few minutes more, to look at the hull, especially along the chines, under some oblique angle light, spot the still shiny holidays and hit them again with the RO.
Hulls nicely dull sanded and tack clothed, I’m ready for the second coat. I’ll use some additional ventilation this time, and get stoned after I finish painting.
I have painted a couple of boats or boat bottoms with EZ-Poxy and have been impressed with it. But I wanted to try the Rustoleum Topside for comparison, and had two white bottomed decked canoes in need of repainting.
Those bottoms were originally painted with regular Rustoleum Enamel ($9 - $10 a quart). Those two boats see very few rocks, but are often in gentle contact with sandy bay bottoms and beaches. I don’t remember if I used multiple coats of Rustoleum Enamel, but the paint on the stems had very quickly worn through and worse, the paint had just as quickly become chalky dull from UV exposure in semi-shady outside storage.
For the time and effort spent sanding, washing and taping, rolling and tipping out, and more sanding between multiple paint coats, it is penny foolish to use cheap paint, and the extra $6 a quart for the Rustoleum topside seems easily justified. The question remains, is it worth spending an extra $25 a quart for EZ-Poxy?
Initial impressions after rolling and tipping the first coat of Rustoleum Topside. Both paints roll and tip and level equally well. The first coat of EZ-Poxy hides small scratches and color imperfections on the hull better, and additional coats of EZ-Poxy hide most everything.
The Rustoleum definitely has more VOC odor; I had a shop exhaust fan going but even so was a little stoned after rolling and tipping two hull bottoms, which only took 35 minutes. Hours of prep work, minutes of rolling and tipping. Dude, don’t bogart that Rustoleum.
Sanding the first coat, using 220 on a RO sander with an infer-face pad, the EZ-Poxy was, at least in memory, noticeably tougher; I cut through the first coat of Rustoleum Topside in a few places when I got incautious. I would prefer to wet sand paint coats outside near the hose, but it is nearly 100F and humid as heck out, and I have the shop AC unit running. Plus those are two heavy, woven roving/glass/thick gel coat hulls, and I don’t feel like hauling them in and out of the shop multiple times.
BTW, I don’t know what I don’t know. Or what I didn’t know. I didn’t know there was such a thing as foam interface pads for RO sanders ‘til Alan Gage suggested them. There are not that many flat areas on a hull bottom, and RO sanding along the chine curves with a hard RO surface was always a risky, oops cut-through again business.
The interface pad makes a huge difference; what would have taken me an hour to hand sand, wet or dry, took but a few minutes. And then a few minutes more, to look at the hull, especially along the chines, under some oblique angle light, spot the still shiny holidays and hit them again with the RO.
Hulls nicely dull sanded and tack clothed, I’m ready for the second coat. I’ll use some additional ventilation this time, and get stoned after I finish painting.